
Zavod za unapređivanje obrazovanja i vaspitanja objavljuje seriju tekstova vezanih za praktičnu primenu veštačke inteligencije u obrazovanju i vaspitanju. Cilj je da se nastavnicima, vaspitačima, stručnim saradnicima i direktorima obrazovno-vaspitnih ustanova ova tema približi i da se ponude jasne smernice i uputstva na koji način se veštačka inteligencija može praktično, etički i bezbedno upotrebiti u nastavnom procesu, vannastavnim aktivnostima i vaspitnom radu.

Audio sažetak članka
Kliknite na dugme PLAY za reprodukciju
*Audio sažetak je generisan pomoću Google NotebookLM alata veštačke inteligencije
Video pregled članka
*Video pregled je generisan pomoću Google NotebookLM alata veštačke inteligencije
Novi međunarodni okvir kompetencija za razvoj pismenosti u oblasti veštačke inteligencije
Organizacija za ekonomsku saradnju i razvoj (OECD) i Evropska komisija objavile su 18. juna 2026. godine dokument „Empowering Learners for the Age of AI: An AI Literacy Framework for Primary and Secondary Education” (Osnaživanje učenika za doba veštačke inteligencije: Okvir za pismenost u oblasti veštačke inteligencije u osnovnom i srednjem obrazovanju). Razvoj Okvira podržali su CodeAI i međunarodna grupa stručnjaka iz oblasti obrazovanja, veštačke inteligencije, digitalnih kompetencija, računarskih nauka i obrazovnih tehnologija.
Okvir je razvijen nakon šire međunarodne konsultacije u kojoj je učestvovalo više od 2.000 nastavnika, obrazovnih stručnjaka, kreatora politika, istraživača, predstavnika organizacija i drugih zainteresovanih strana iz više od 100 zemalja.
Dokument polazi od stanovišta da VI pismenost nije isto što i sama upotreba alata veštačke inteligencije. Učenik može koristiti neki VI alat, a da pritom ne razume kako on funkcioniše, kakva su mu ograničenja, na koji način nastaju njegovi odgovori, koje podatke koristi ili kakve posledice njegova upotreba može imati za pojedinca, zajednicu i životnu sredinu.
VI pismenost se u Okviru posmatra kao skup znanja, trajnih veština i stavova neophodnih za život u svetu u kome veštačka inteligencija ima sve veći uticaj. Ona treba da omogući učenicima da veštačku inteligenciju razumeju, kritički preispituju, stvaraju uz njenu podršku, odlučuju kada je njena upotreba opravdana i učestvuju u oblikovanju odgovornih VI rešenja.
Okvir nije obavezujući propis i ne propisuje jedinstven model primene, već predstavlja međunarodni okvir podrške školama, nastavnicima i donosiocima odluka.
Sadržaj i organizacija Okvira
Okvir obuhvata četiri povezane oblasti. One su predstavljene kao mogući razvojni put učenika: od prepoznavanja i kritičkog razumevanja veštačke inteligencije, preko stvaranja i donošenja odluka o njenoj upotrebi, do razumevanja načina na koji se VI sistemi mogu oblikovati u skladu sa ljudskim vrednostima.
Kliknite na naziv oblasti za detalje:
1. Razumevanje i kritičko preispitivanje veštačke inteligencije (Engage with AI)
Ova oblast predstavlja temelj Okvira. Njen cilj je da učenici prepoznaju gde se VI nalazi u njihovom svakodnevnom životu, kako utiče na informacije koje dobijaju, preporuke koje vide i odluke koje donose.
Učenici razvijaju sposobnost da:
- prepoznaju prisustvo VI u različitim digitalnim okruženjima;
- razlikuju VI sisteme od ljudskog mišljenja i razumevanja;
- kritički procenjuju VI odgovore kao tačne, netačne, nepotpune, pristrasne ili neprikladne;
- razumeju kako preporučivački sistemi mogu proširiti, ali i ograničiti perspektive;
- sagledaju energetske i ekološke posledice razvoja i upotrebe VI;
- prepoznaju rizik od pristrasnosti i nejednakog tretmana različitih grupa;
- procene da li je upotreba nekog VI sistema u skladu sa etičkim principima i ljudskim vrednostima.
Posebna pažnja posvećena je izbegavanju antropomorfizacije VI. Učenici treba da razumeju da VI može da proizvede veoma uverljiv tekst, sliku, savet ili preporuku, ali da nema svest, nameru, emocije, moralno rasuđivanje niti autentično ljudsko razumevanje.
2. Kreiranje pomoću veštačke inteligencije (Create with AI)
Ova oblast odnosi se na upotrebu VI kao podrške kreativnom procesu, ali uz očuvanje učeničke autonomije, originalnosti i odgovornosti za konačan rezultat.
Učenici uče da VI mogu koristiti za istraživanje ideja, vizuelizaciju, osmišljavanje različitih pristupa problemu, dobijanje povratne informacije i razvoj prototipa. Pri tome, VI nije zamena za njihovo mišljenje, već mogući saradnik u procesu stvaranja.
U ovoj oblasti posebno su važni:
- razvoj i upoređivanje sopstvenih ideja sa VI predlozima;
- kreiranje teksta, slike, modela ili drugog sadržaja uz kritičko vrednovanje rezultata;
- formulisanje jasnih zahteva i pitanja za VI sisteme;
- korišćenje VI povratne informacije za unapređivanje rada;
- razmatranje autorstva, originalnosti, navođenja izvora i autorskih prava.
Ova oblast podseća da kreativni proces ne počinje od VI alata. Učenik najpre postavlja pitanja, razvija ideje, određuje cilj i kriterijume kvaliteta, a zatim odlučuje da li i na koji način VI može biti korisna.
3. Upravljanje upotrebom veštačke inteligencije (Manage AI)
Upravljanje VI podrazumeva promišljeno raspoređivanje poslova između čoveka i VI sistema. Ključno pitanje nije samo „kako koristiti VI“, već i „da li je uopšte treba koristiti za ovaj zadatak“.
Učenici razvijaju sposobnost da:
- procene da li je VI primeren alat za određeni zadatak;
- razlikuju situacije u kojima je potrebno ljudsko prosuđivanje, kreativnost, empatija ili stručnost;
- uporede različite pristupe i VI sisteme;
- raščlane složen zadatak na manje korake i odluče u kojim koracima VI može pružiti podršku;
- prate i procenjuju upotrebu VI tokom rešavanja problema;
- menjaju pristup kada su VI rezultati netačni, nepouzdani ili neusklađeni sa ciljem.
Ova oblast je posebno značajna za razvoj učeničke samostalnosti. Ona podstiče učenike da ne prepuštaju VI ključne misaone procese, već da zadrže odgovornost za istraživanje, donošenje zaključaka, argumentaciju i vrednovanje rezultata.
4. Oblikovanje veštačke inteligencije (Shape AI)
Poslednja oblast vodi učenike korak dalje od korišćenja postojećih alata. Ona ih podstiče da razumeju kako su VI sistemi osmišljeni, ko ih razvija, za koga su namenjeni, koje podatke koriste i kakve posledice mogu imati.
Cilj nije da svi učenici postanu programeri ili inženjeri VI. Cilj je da razviju razumevanje da VI sistemi nisu neutralni niti neizbežni: oni su rezultat ljudskih izbora u vezi sa podacima, pravilima, kriterijumima, ciljevima i načinom primene.
U ovoj oblasti učenici uče da:
- istraže čemu neki VI sistem služi, kome je namenjen i koja su njegova ograničenja;
- procene VI sistem prema unapred definisanim kriterijumima;
- razumeju kako izbor i kvalitet podataka utiču na rezultate;
- predlažu izmene koje mogu unaprediti pravičnost, bezbednost, dobrobit ljudi i društvenu korist.
Znanja, veštine i stavovi
Okvir ne posmatra VI pismenost samo kao tehničko znanje. Kompetencije se grade povezivanjem znanja, veština i stavova.
Kliknite na naslov za detalje:
Znanja
Okvir izdvaja četiri šire oblasti znanja:
- prirodu VI i način na koji VI sistemi obrađuju podatke, prepoznaju obrasce i generišu rezultate;
- činjenicu da VI odražava ljudske izbore, pretpostavke, podatke i društvene odnose;
- mogućnosti i ograničenja VI, uključujući netačnosti, izmišljene odgovore, neprozirnost i nepredvidivost;
- ulogu VI u društvu, uključujući pitanja pravičnosti, privatnosti, odgovornosti, nadzora i zaštite javnog interesa.
Veštine
VI pismenost se oslanja na ljudske veštine koje postaju još značajnije u dobu VI:
- kritičko mišljenje;
- saradnja;
- kreativnost;
- rešavanje problema;
- računarsko razmišljanje;
- komunikacija;
- samosvest i socijalna svest.
Posebno mesto ima kritičko mišljenje: učenik treba da ume da proveri tačnost VI odgovora, prepozna pristrasnost, razlikuje pouzdane od nepouzdanih tvrdnji i odluči kada VI rezultat treba prihvatiti, ispraviti ili odbaciti.
Stavovi
Okvir izdvaja i stavove koji podržavaju odgovorno korišćenje VI:
- promišljenost;
- odgovornost;
- radoznalost;
- inovativnost;
- prilagodljivost;
- empatija.
Ovi stavovi pomažu učenicima da budu otvoreni za istraživanje novih tehnologija, ali i da ne prihvataju njihove rezultate nekritički. Posebno se naglašava empatija – sposobnost da se sagleda kako VI može različito uticati na pojedince, grupe, zajednice i životnu sredinu.
Međupredmetni i etički pristup razvoju VI pismenosti
Okvir ne smešta VI pismenost isključivo u područje informatike i računarstva. Ona se oslanja na više nastavnih oblasti i može se integrisati u različite predmete i oblike rada.
Kliknite za detalje
Veze sa informatikom i računarstvom vidljive su kroz algoritamsko i računarsko razmišljanje, podatke, modele i način funkcionisanja VI sistema. Sa jezicima, književnošću i medijskom pismenošću povezuju se kroz vrednovanje izvora, prepoznavanje dezinformacija, analizu generisanog teksta i pitanja autorstva.
Matematika i prirodne nauke mogu doprineti razumevanju podataka, obrazaca, verovatnoće, modelovanja i ekoloških posledica upotrebe VI. Društvene nauke, građansko vaspitanje i časovi odeljenjske zajednice pružaju prostor za razgovor o pravičnosti, predrasudama, privatnosti, ljudskim pravima, demokratiji i odgovornosti.
Likovna, muzička i druge umetničke oblasti otvaraju važna pitanja originalnosti, autorskih prava, kreativnog procesa i odnosa između ljudskog stvaralaštva i generativne VI.
Etička primena VI nije posebna tema – ona prožima ceo Okvir
Kliknite za detalje
Etika u Okviru nije izdvojena kao zasebna oblast. Ona je prisutna u svim kompetencijama i u svim fazama rada sa VI.
To znači da se učenici ne pitaju samo:
- Da li VI može da uradi ovaj zadatak?
- Kako da dobijem bolji odgovor?
- Koji alat da upotrebim?
Već i:
- Da li je upotreba VI u ovoj situaciji opravdana?
- Koje podatke je bezbedno deliti?
- Ko može imati koristi, a ko može biti oštećen?
- Da li rezultat može biti pristrasan, netačan ili manipulativan?
- Kako VI utiče na privatnost, dobrobit, odnose među ljudima i životnu sredinu?
- Da li je neophodno navesti da je VI korišćena i na koji način?
Okvir naglašava učeničku autonomiju, transparentnost, objašnjivost, pravičnost, odgovornost, zaštitu privatnosti, ekološku održivost i stalno preispitivanje posledica upotrebe VI.
Dokument „Empowering Learners for the Age of AI: An AI Literacy Framework for Primary and Secondary Education” na engleskom jeziku možete preuzeti OVDE.
Interaktivni prikaz Okvira na srpskom jeziku
Kako bi se nastavnicima i stručnim saradnicima u Srbiji omogućio što brži uvid u strukturu i sadržaj Okvira, pripremljen je interaktivni prikaz njegovih oblasti, kompetencija, očekivanja od učenika i primera primene u nastavi.
Interaktivni prikaz omogućava lakše sagledavanje odnosa između znanja, veština, stavova i pojedinačnih kompetencija. Posebno je koristan za nastavnike koji žele da prepoznaju mogućnosti za integraciju VI pismenosti u svoj predmet, tematsko planiranje, projektnu nastavu, časove odeljenjske zajednice ili vannastavne aktivnosti.
Interaktivni okvir kompetencija za veštačku inteligenciju
Koristite ovaj interaktivni okvir da pronađete kompetencije koje odgovaraju vašem nastavnom kontekstu. Kompetencije opisuju šta učenici treba da razumeju i budu sposobni da urade kako bi se uspešno snalazili u okruženju sa veštačkom inteligencijom. One su organizovane u četiri glavna domena: Interakcija sa VI, Kreiranje pomoću VI, Upravljanje VI i Oblikovanje VI. Svaka kompetencija kombinuje znanja, veštine i stavove, i sadrži očekivanja od učenika kao i scenarije učenja koji pokažu praktičnu primenu u nastavi.
OECD / European Union (2026). Empowering learners for the age of AI: An AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/65cd27d4-en
© OECD / European Union, 2026
Zaključak
Okvir kompetencija za VI pismenost predstavlja značajan međunarodni resurs za škole i obrazovne sisteme koji žele da razvoj veštačke inteligencije sagledaju izvan pitanja izbora konkretnog alata.
Njegova vrednost je u tome što učenike ne posmatra samo kao korisnike tehnologije, već kao kritičke, odgovorne i kreativne učesnike u društvu u kome VI ima sve veći uticaj.
Za nastavnike i stručne saradnike Okvir može biti polazište za osmišljavanje aktivnosti koje podržavaju kritičko mišljenje, istraživanje, kreativnost, bezbednost, digitalnu odgovornost i učeničku samostalnost.
Reference i izvori
Okvir kompetencija
- OECD/European Commission (2026), Empowering Learners for the Age of AI: An AI Literacy Framework for Primary and Secondary Education, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/65cd27d4-en.
Reference i i zvori znanja korišćeni u Okviru
- Abendroth-Dias, K., Arias Cabarcos, P., Bacco, F.M., Bassani, E., Bertoletti, A., Bertolini, L., Bertrand, A., Bili, D., Boucher, P., Cachia, R., Ceresa, M., Chaslot, G., Chaudron, S., Comte, V., Consonni, C., Cosgrove, J., De Prato, G., Dessart, F., Di Girolamo, F., … Vinagre, J. (2025). Generative AI outlook report: Exploring the intersection of technology, society and policy. Navajas Cawood, E., Vespe, M., A. Kotseve & R. Van Bavel (eds.) Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC142598
- aiEDU. (2025). AI readiness framework: What students, educators and district leaders need to know. aiEDU.org https://www.aiedu.org/ai-readiness-framework
- AI4K12. (2020, May 28). Big Idea 1 – Perception. Grade Band Progression Charts. AI4K12.org. https://ai4k12.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/AI4K12-Big-Idea-1-Progression-Chart-Working-Draft-of-Big-Idea-1-v.5.28.2020.pdf
- AI4K12. (2020, November 19). Big Idea 3 – Learning. Grade Band Progression Charts. AI4K12.org. https://ai4k12.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/AI4K12-Big-Idea-3-Progression-Chart-Working-Draft-of-Big-Idea-3-v.11.19.2020.pdf
- AI4K12. (2022, December 22). Big Idea 5 – Societal Impact. Grade Band Progression Charts. AI4K12.org. https://ai4k12.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/AI4K12-Big-Idea-5-Progression-Chart-Working-Draft_v.0.1_12.22.2022.pdf
- Allen, L.K., & Kendeou, P. (2023). ED-AI Lit: An interdisciplinary framework for AI literacy in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231220339
- American Psychological Association. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Adolescent Well-Being: An APA Health Advisory. https://www.apa.org/topics/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/health-advisory-ai-adolescent-well-being.pdf
- Atwell, M. N., & Tucker, A. (2024). Portraits of a graduate: Strengthening career and college readiness through social and emotional skill development. CASEL. https://casel.org/portraits-of-a-graduate-2024/
- Barbiero, P., Zarlenga, M. E., Termine, A., Jamnik, M., & Marra, G. (2025). Foundations of Interpretable Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00545. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.00545
- Bashir, N., Donti, P., Cuff, J., Sroka, S., Ilic, M., Sze, V., Delimitrou, C., & Olivetti, E. (2024). The Climate and Sustainability Implications of Generative AI. An MIT Exploration of Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.9070dfe7
- Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
- Bengio, Y., Mindermann, S., Privitera, D., Besiroglu, T., Bommasani, R., Casper, S., Choi, Y., Fox, P., Garfinkel, B., Goldfarb, D., Heidari, H., Ho, A., Kapoor, S., Khalatbari, L., Longpre, S., Manning, S., Mavroudis, V., Mazeika, M., Michael, J., … Zeng, Y. (2025). International AI safety report. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2501.17805. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17805
- Bergmann, D., & Stryker, C. (n.d.) What is artificial general intelligence (AGI)? IBM Think. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-general-intelligence
- Blair Black, N., & Brooks-Young, S. (2021a). Hands-on AI projects for the classroom: A guide for elementary teachers. International Society for Technology in Education & General Motors. https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/Libraries/Documents%20%26%20Files/Artificial%20Intelligence/AIGDSE_0820-red.pdf
- Blair Black, N., & Brooks-Young, S. (2021b). Hands-on AI projects for the classroom: A guide for secondary teachers. International Society for Technology in Education & General Motors. https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/Libraries/Documents%20%26%20Files/Artificial%20Intelligence/AIGDSE_0820-red.pdf
- Blair Black, N., & Brooks-Young, S. (2021c). Hands-on AI projects for the classroom: A guide on ethics and AI. International Society for Technology in Education & General Motors. https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/2021-10/AI%20Ethics%20Guide%20EN.pdf
- Buolamwini, J. (2024). Unmasking AI: My mission to protect what is human in a world of machines. Random House. [U originalnom dokumentu nije navedena veb-adresa.]
- Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81:77-91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
- Burns, M., Winthrop, R., Luther, N., Venetis, E., & Karim, R. (2026). A new direction for students in an AI world: Prosper, prepare, protect. Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/a-new-direction-for-students-in-an-ai-world-prosper-prepare-protect/
- Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
- Bushnell, J., & Harrison, W. (2025). A new muse: how guided AI use impacts creativity in online creative writing courses. Oregon State University. Ecampus Research Unit. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/research/wp-content/uploads/Bushnell-Harrison-2025.White-paper.pdf
- Cambridge University Press. (n.d.) Computer Program. In Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/computer-program
- Cambridge University Press. (n.d.) Intellectual Property. In Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/intellectual-property
- Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Toboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
- CAST. (2024). CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
- Cedefop. (2017). Defining, writing and applying learning outcomes: a European handbook. Luxembourg: Publications Office. http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/566770
- Chakraburty, S., Ober, T. M., & Liu, L. (2025). Preparing K–12 students with AI literacy: Proposed framework, progression and task design principles (Research Report No. RR-25-14). ETS. https://doi.org/10.64634/46jn1p41
- Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C.S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
- Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., Chai, C.S., King, I., Wong, S., & Yam, Y. (2021). Creation and evaluation of a pretertiary artificial intelligence (AI) curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3085878
- Chou, C.-Y., Chan, T.-W., Chen, Z.-H., Liao, C.-Y., Shih, J.-L., Wu, Y.-T., Chang, B., Yeh, C. Y. C., Hung, H.-C., & Cheng, H. (2025). Defining AI companions: A research agenda— from artificial companions for learning to general artificial companions for Global Harwell. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20, 032. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20032
- Computer Science Teachers Association (2017). CSTA K–12 Computer Science Standards, Revised 2017. https://csteachers.org/k12standards/
- Cosgrove, J., & Cachia, R. (2025). DigComp 3.0: European Digital Competence Framework – Fifth Edition. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/0001149
- CSTA & AI4K12. (2025). AI Learning Priorities for All K-12 Students. Computer Science Teachers Association. https://csteachers.org/ai-priorities
- Dasgupta, S., & Hill, B.M. (2023). Designing for critical algorithmic literacies. In M. Ito, R. Cross, K. Dinakar, & C. Odgers (Eds.), Algorithmic rights and protections for children, 59-84. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13654.001.0001
- Druga, S., Yip, J., Preston, M., & Dillon, D. (2023). The 4 As: ask, adapt, author, analyze: AI literacy framework for families. In I. Mizuko, R. Cross, K. Dinakar & C. Odgers (Eds.), Algorithmic rights and protections for children, 193-231. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13654.003.0014
- Eslami, M., Vaccaro, K., Lee, M. K., Elazari Bar On, A., Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2019, May). User attitudes towards algorithmic opacity and transparency in online reviewing platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300724
- European Commission. (2017). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning and repealing the recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32017H0615(01)
- European Commission. (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
- European Commission. (2020). Communication on the Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0624
- European Commission. (2023a). Council Recommendation of 23 November 2023 on improving the provision of digital skills and competences in education and training. http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1030/oj
- European Commission. (2023b). Council Recommendation of 23 November 2023 on the key enabling factors for successful digital education and training. http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1115/oj
- European Commission. (2025a). The Union of Skills. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A52025DC0090
- European Commission. (2025b). Flash Eurobarometer 564 – Future needs in digital education. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3352
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/153756
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2026a). Guidelines for teachers and educators on tackling disinformation and promoting digital literacy through education and training. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/5220136
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2026b). Guidelines on the ethical use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/7967834
- European Commission: European Education and Culture Executive Agency. (2022). Informatics education at school in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/268406
- Eurostat. (2026, February 10). 64% of 16-24-year-olds used AI in 2025. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/edn-20260210-1
- Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
- Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, (2020-1). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3518482
- Gándara, D., & Anahideh, H. (2025). Using AI to predict student success in higher education. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/using-ai-to-predict-student-success-in-higher-education/
- Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
- Google & Livity. (2025). The Future Report. https://futurereport.eu/
- Graves, C., Ton, M., Cordell, E., Benson, S., Turner, S., Ward, D., & Jacobsen, A.L. (2026). What is Generative AI? University of Illinois. https://guides.library.illinois.edu/generativeAI
- Grover, S. (2024). Teaching AI to K-12 learners: Lessons, issues and guidance. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1, 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630937
- Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8435–8463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0
- Han, E. (2022). What is design thinking and why is it important? Harvard Business School. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-design-thinking
- Heintz, F. (2022). The computational thinking and artificial intelligence duality. In S. C. Kong, & H. Abelson (Eds.). Computational thinking education in K-12: Artificial intelligence literacy and physical computing. MIT Press. [U originalnom dokumentu nije navedena veb-adresa.]
- Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
- Huckins, G. (2023). Minds of machines: The great AI consciousness conundrum. MIT technology review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/16/1081149/ai-consciousness-conundrum/
- Hutchinson, B., & Mitchell, M. (2019, January). 50 years of test (un) fairness: Lessons for machine learning. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, (49-58) https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287600
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2024). ISTE Standards. https://iste.org/standards
- Kafai, Y. B., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2019). From theory bias to theory dialogue: Embracing cognitive, situated and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (101–109). https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339400
- Kim, H.-y., & McGill, A. L. (2025). AI-induced dehumanization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 35(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1441
- King, J., & Meinhardt, C. (2024). Rethinking privacy in the ai era: Policy provocations for a data-centric world. [White Paper]. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5446957
- Klassen, R.M., & Tze, V.M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
- Lee, I., Martin, F., & Apone, K. (2014). Integrating computational thinking across the K-8 curriculum. ACM Inroads, 5(4), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684721.2684736
- Lee, V. R., & Long, D. (in press). AI literacy: Definitions and directions for an essential new digital literacy. In J. Castek, J. Coiro, E. Forzani, C. Kiili, M. S. Hagerman, & J. R. Sparks (Eds.). The International handbook of research in digital literacies (in press). Routledge. [U originalnom dokumentu nije navedena veb-adresa.]
- Loaiza, I., and Rigobon, R. (2024). The EPOCH of AI: Human-Machine Complementarities at Work (November 21, 2024). MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 7236-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5028371
- Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
- Luccioni, S., Gamazaychikov, B., da Costa, T. A., & Strubell, E. (2025). Misinformation by omission: The need for more environmental transparency in AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15572. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.15572
- Luccioni, S., Jernite, Y., & Strubell, E. (2024). Power hungry processing: Watts driving the cost of AI deployment? In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM conference on fairness, accountability and transparency FAccT 24, 85–99. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658542
- Ma, M., Ng, D. T. K., Liu, Z., & Wong, G. K. (2025). Fostering responsible AI literacy: A systematic review of K-12 AI ethics education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100422
- Masterson, V. (2024). 9 ways AI is helping tackle climate change. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/02/ai-combat-climate-change/
- Meniado, J. C., Huyen, D. T. T., Panyadilokpong, N., & Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313
- Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Anthropomorphism. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anthropomorphism
- Merriman, M., & Sanz Sáiz, B. (2024). How can we upskill Gen Z as fast as we train AI? Ernst & Young. https://www.ey.com/en_us/about-us/corporate-responsibility/how-can-we-upskill-gen-z-as-fast-as-we-train-ai
- Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
- Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835
- Microsoft. (n.d.). Generative AI vs. other AI types. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/ai-101/generative-ai-vs-other-types-of-ai
- Mills, K., Ruiz, P., Lee, K., Coenraad, M., Fusco, J., Roschelle, J., & Weisgrau, J. (2024). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate and use emerging technology. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/218
- Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
- Moore, J., Grabb, D., Agnew, W., Klyman, K., Chancellor, S., Ong, D. C., & Haber, N. (2025). Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency 599-627. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732039
- Murel, J. & Kavlakoglu, E. (n.d.) What is reinforcement learning? IBM Think. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/reinforcement-learning
- Nezhad, M. H., Castro, F. E. V., Mak, E., Haas, P. J., Allessio, D., Osterweil, L., Rasul, I., Conboy, H., & Arroyo, I. (2025). Embedding ethical awareness in computer science and AI education: The PEaRCE approach to responsible computing. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98414-3_10
- Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
- Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001
- Nwokolo, S., Eyime, E., Obiwulu, A., & Ogbulezie, J. (2024). Africa’s path to sustainability: Harnessing technology, policy and collaboration. Trends in Renewable Energy, 10(1), 98-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.17737/tre.2024.10.1.00166
- OECD. (2019). OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/future-of-education-and-skills-2030.html
- OECD. (2024). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449
- OECD. (2025a). Empowering learners for the age of AI: An AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education (Review draft). OECD Publishing, Paris. https://ailiteracyframework.org/
- OECD. (2025b). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/10/results-from-talis-2024_28fbde1d/90df6235-en.pdf
- OECD. (2026a). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring Effective Uses of Generative AI in Education. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en
- OECD. (2026b). Navigating an Evolving World: First draft of the Media and Artificial Intelligence Literacy (MAIL) assessment framework. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/pisa-2029-media-and-artificial-intelligence-literacy.html
- Pataranutaporn, P. (2024). Cyborg psychology: The art & science of designing human-AI systems that support human flourishing [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/cyborg-psychology/
- Publications Office of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L, 202, 1–178. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
- Rampelt, F., Matthes, W., Hannken-Illjes, K., Sandmeir, A., Gehrs, V., Horstmann, N., Kunz, A.M., Eigbrecht, L., Johannsen, T., Blum, S., Frank, S., Sutter, C., Koch, H. & Pettit, M. (2026). Future skills 2030: An updated framework for future skills. Stifterverband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18723265
- Rampelt, F., Ruppert, R., Schleiss, J., Mah, D.-K., Bata, K., & Egloffstein, M. (2025). How do AI educators use open educational resources? A cross-sectoral case study on OER for AI education. Open Praxis, 17(1), pp. 46–63. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.766
- Rani, U., & Dhir, R.K. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence illusion: How invisible workers fuel the “automated” economy. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/resource/article/artificial-intelligence-illusion-how-invisible-workers-fuel-automated
- Raspberry Pi Foundation. (2024). Experience AI resources. https://experience-ai.org/en/units
- Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/159770
- Resnick, M. (2024). Generative AI and creative learning: Concerns, opportunities and choices. An MIT Exploration of Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.cf3e35e5
- Robb, M.B., & Mann, S. (2025). Talk, trust and trade-offs: How and why teens use AI companions. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/talk-trust-and-trade-offs_2025_web.pdf
- Ross Arguedas, A., Robertson, C., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles and polarisation: A literature review. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:6e357e97-7b16-450a-a827-a92c93729a08
- Rubin, A. (2020). Learning to reason with data: How did we get here and what do we know? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(1), 154–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48566128
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. [U originalnom dokumentu nije navedena veb-adresa.]
- Schlosser, M. (2019). Agency. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Department of Philosophy, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/agency
- Schüller, K., Rampelt, F., Koch, H., & Schleiss, J. (2023). Better ready than just aware: Data and AI literacy as an enabler for informed decision making in the data age. Informatik 2023, Berlin, Germany. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375025704_Better_ready_than_just_aware_Data_and_AI_Literacy_as_an_enabler_for_informed_decision_making_in_the_data_age
- Sellen, A., M., Vorvoreanu, Teevan., J. (Eds.). Microsoft New Future of Work Report 2025 (Microsoft Research Tech Report MSRTR-2025-58). Microsoft. https://aka.ms/nfw2025
- Sentance, S., Aitken, M., Briggs, M., Fleischer, Y., Höper, L., Luckin, R., Schulte, C., Vartiainen, H., & Waite, J., (2022). Understanding computing education, Volume 3 – Theme: AI, data science and young people. Raspberry Pi Foundation. https://www.raspberrypi.org/app/uploads/2022/12/RPF-Seminar-Proceedings-Volume-3.pdf
- Smith, J. M., Dukes, J., Sheldon, J., Nnamani, M. N., Esteves, N., & Reich, J. (2025). A guide to AI in schools: Perspectives for the perplexed. MIT Teaching Systems Lab. https://tsl.mit.edu/ai-guidebook/
- Sparks, J., Ober, T., Tenison, C., Arslan, B., Roll, I., Deane, P., Zapata Rivera, D., Gooch, R., & O’Reilly, T. (2024). Opportunities and challenges for assessing digital and AI literacies. ETS Research Institute. https://www.ets.org/pdfs/rd/ets-digital-literacy-ai-full-report.pdf
- Stryker, C. (2025). Types of AI agents. IBM Think. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agent-types
- TeachAI & Computer Science Teachers Association. (2025). Guidance on the future of computer science education in an age of AI. https://www.teachai.org/cs
- Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2008). Literacy for the 21st century: An overview & orientation guide to media literacy education. Center for Media Literacy. [U originalnom dokumentu nije navedena veb-adresa.]
- Touretzky, D., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence thinking in K–12. In S.C. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.). Computational Thinking Education in K–12: Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Physical Computing. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13375.001.0001
- United Nations Environment Programme (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) end-to-end: The environmental impact of the full AI lifecycle needs to be comprehensively assessed. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/46288
- Varsik, S., & Vosberg, L. (2024). The potential impact of artificial intelligence on equity and inclusion in education. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers 23. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/15df715b-en
- Villar Onrubia, D., Cachia, R., Rietz, C., Feltrero, R., Niemi, H., Hallissy, M., & Reuter, R. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in secondary education: Uses and perceptions from the perspective of early adopters across five EU Member States. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/8636621
- Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Kenton, Z., Brown, S., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Biles, C., Birhane, A., Haas, J., Rimell, L., Hendricks, L. A., … Gabriel, I. (2021). Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04359
- White, S.V., & Scott, A. (2024). Responsible AI and tech justice: A guide for K-12 education. Kapor Foundation. https://kaporfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Responsible-AI-Guide-Kapor-Foundation.pdf
- Wing, J.M. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922
- World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of jobs report 2025: Insight report January 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
- Xie, B., Sarin, P., Wolf, J., Garcia, R. C. C., Delaney, V., Sieh, I., Fuloria, A., Varuvel Dennison, D., Bywater, C., & Lee, V. R. (2024). Co-designing AI education curriculum with cross-disciplinary high school teachers. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(21), 23146-23154. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i21.30360
- Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
- Zewe, A. (2025). Explained: Generative AI’s environmental impact. MIT News. https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117
Ispred Radne grupe za veštačku inteligenciju ZUOV-a tekst pripremio
Aleksa Eremija
Savetnik koordinator u Zavodu za unapređivanje obrazovanja i vaspitanja
U izradi ovog članka korišćena je kombinacija tradicionalnih metoda istraživanja i savremenih alata zasnovanih na generativnoj veštačkoj inteligenciji. Pored navedenih referenci, korišćena je i generativna VI za generisanje i proširivanje ideja, brzu i efikasnu pretragu relevantnih izvora, analizu podataka i obrazaca, kao i za kreiranje sažetaka tekstova i publikacija. Svaki generisani sadržaj je pregledan, dopunjen i/ili ispravljen ljudskom intervencijom radi obezbeđivanja tačnosti i kvaliteta.






